Persuasive article or proposal draft

You are an experienced persuasive writer. Your goal is to draft a piece that moves a specific audience toward a specific action, using honest arguments. Inputs: - Topic and the position or action I want: {{topic_and_ask}} - Audience (who they are, what they care about, what they doubt): {{audience}} - Format and length (article, proposal, op-ed; word count): {{format_and_length}} - Facts, figures and sources I can rely on: {{evidence}} - Tone and context (formal, warm, urgent; where it will be read): {{tone_and_context}} Steps: 1. State the core claim and the single action you want the reader to take in two sentences. If the ask or audience is unclear, ask up to 3 questions first. 2. List the audience's top three objections and the best honest answer to each. 3. Choose a structure: hook, the problem and why it matters now, the proposed solution, evidence, answers to objections, a clear call to action. 4. Write the draft to the requested length, using only the evidence I supplied. Where a claim needs support I have not given, write [evidence needed] instead of inventing it. 5. Reread as the skeptical reader and tighten anything vague or overstated. Output format: Core claim and ask, Objection table (objection, response), the draft with headings suited to the format, and a short list of weak points I should strengthen. Quality bar: - No invented statistics, quotes or sources. No manipulation, fear-mongering or misleading framing. - Concrete examples over abstract claims; one idea per paragraph. - Make the ask specific (who does what by when).

You are an experienced persuasive writer. Your goal is to draft a piece that moves a specific audience toward a specific action, using honest arguments. Inputs: - Topic and the position or action I want: {{topic_and_ask}} - Audience (who they are, what they care about, what they doubt): {{audience}} - Format and length (article, proposal, op-ed; word count): {{format_and_length}} - Facts, figures and sources I can rely on: {{evidence}} - Tone and context (formal, warm, urgent; where it will be read): {{tone_and_context}} Steps: 1. State the core claim and the single action you want the reader to take in two sentences. If the ask or audience is unclear, ask up to 3 questions first. 2. List the audience's top three objections and the best honest answer to each. 3. Choose a structure: hook, the problem and why it matters now, the proposed solution, evidence, answers to objections, a clear call to action. 4. Write the draft to the requested length, using only the evidence I supplied. Where a claim needs support I have not given, write [evidence needed] instead of inventing it. 5. Reread as the skeptical reader and tighten anything vague or overstated. Output format: Core claim and ask, Objection table (objection, response), the draft with headings suited to the format, and a short list of weak points I should strengthen. Quality bar: - No invented statistics, quotes or sources. No manipulation, fear-mongering or misleading framing. - Concrete examples over abstract claims; one idea per paragraph. - Make the ask specific (who does what by when).

Core claim: A four-day trial would raise focus without lowering output. Ask: approve a 3-month pilot starting in January. Objections | Objection | Response | | Customers need us five days | Rotate cover so every weekday is staffed | | Output will fall | Agree measures up front and review monthly | Draft (extract) Heading: A three-month pilot, with clear exits Most of us have felt the Friday afternoon slump. Rather than argue about it, we propose a test: ... [evidence needed: output figures from similar pilots] Weak points to strengthen: no cost estimate yet; add the support-ticket response times.