Literature reviews, source checks, summaries and papers. 21 reviewed prompts for research.
Builds a practical plan for running a clinical study at a site: start-up tasks, recruitment and retention, consent, data quality, safety reporting, and audit readiness. Use when preparing a site to start a study.
Either plans a user research study tied to a product decision (method, participants, guide, timeline) or turns interview notes, survey results or usability sessions into themed, evidence-backed findings. Use it at the start or end of a study.
Maps how a topic connects to other fields, with example applications and collaboration ideas. Use when seeking fresh angles for a paper, project, lesson or product.
Reads pasted forum threads, reviews or comments on a topic and reports what people actually recommend and complain about, with mention counts, short quotes, disagreements and gaps. Use when choosing a tool or approach based on real user opinion.
Tests an idea, theory or invention against what is already known, telling you if it is a rediscovery, a misunderstanding or genuinely open. Use it before you invest time in a notion.
Produces a structured research brief on a question, broken into sub-questions, with findings tied to sources, conflicting evidence, open gaps and an honest confidence level. Use when you need a reliable overview before a decision or a report.
Plans a rigorous quantitative study of whether one thing caused another: states the target effect, picks and justifies a design, lists threats, diagnostics and robustness checks, and ends with a reproducibility checklist. Use before running any analysis meant to support a causal claim.
Drafts academic sections from your notes and sources, polishes existing text with three alternative versions, or explains a paper's question, method and limits, with no invented citations. Use it for papers, theses and reports.
Helps you spot under-studied questions in a set of papers you provide, and turns each into a possible research question. Use it when planning a thesis, review or grant.
Builds a clear, layered map of a field with its main branches, subfields and topics, plus how they relate. Use it when starting a literature review, course outline or reading list.
Use when answering research, analysis or fact-finding questions: labels how well supported each claim is, flags possibly outdated knowledge, presents competing explanations and points out biased framing instead of agreeing by default.
Answers a question using only the sources you paste in, with an evidence table, conflicts between sources, gaps and a confidence rating. Use it when you need an answer you can defend and trace.
