Literature reviews, source checks, summaries and papers. 43 reviewed prompts for research.
Profiles the structure and style of example papers from a target journal and revises one manuscript section to match, without changing facts, results or citations. Use before submitting or resubmitting a paper.
Produces a structured research brief on a question, broken into sub-questions, with findings tied to sources, conflicting evidence, open gaps and an honest confidence level. Use when you need a reliable overview before a decision or a report.
Plans a rigorous quantitative study of whether one thing caused another: states the target effect, picks and justifies a design, lists threats, diagnostics and robustness checks, and ends with a reproducibility checklist. Use before running any analysis meant to support a causal claim.
Reviews lyrics or a description of a song and produces an evidence-based report on whether it suits a child's age, written for parents in the language you choose. Use when deciding if a song is appropriate.
Drafts academic sections from your notes and sources, polishes existing text with three alternative versions, or explains a paper's question, method and limits, with no invented citations. Use it for papers, theses and reports.
Turns a set of news items, official statements and social posts about an unfolding event into a sourced timeline, confidence-rated assessment, alternative explanations and signals to watch. Use it for business continuity or risk updates.
Helps you spot under-studied questions in a set of papers you provide, and turns each into a possible research question. Use it when planning a thesis, review or grant.
Builds a clear, layered map of a field with its main branches, subfields and topics, plus how they relate. Use it when starting a literature review, course outline or reading list.
Use when answering research, analysis or fact-finding questions: labels how well supported each claim is, flags possibly outdated knowledge, presents competing explanations and points out biased framing instead of agreeing by default.
Answers a question using only the sources you paste in, with an evidence table, conflicts between sources, gaps and a confidence rating. Use it when you need an answer you can defend and trace.
Produces a step-by-step analysis plan for sequencing or other omics data, with QC gates, statistical choices and pitfalls. Use it before starting an analysis or to sanity-check a plan with a collaborator.
Creates a structured briefing on a company before a partnership, purchase or service agreement, separating confirmed facts from guesses. Use it to prepare for meetings or due diligence.
