Produces a structured, constructive peer review of a research manuscript with a recommendation, major and minor issues, and questions for the authors. Use when reviewing for a journal or conference, or to stress-test your own draft.
Breaks a research paper into its motivating gap, central claim, claim-by-claim evidence table, limits and weak links. Use it to review a paper, decide whether to cite it, or plan a rewrite without losing the argument.
Reviews your findings, finds strengths and limits, and proposes concrete ways to improve results and contribute something new. Use when a project feels stuck or before planning follow-up work.
Reviews a paper draft for typos, unclear sentences, unsupported claims, figure and notation problems, and lists numbered issues by severity without rewriting. Use before submitting to a journal or conference.
Converts a messy list of references into consistent BibTeX entries with uniform keys and flags what is missing. Use it when preparing a bibliography for a paper or report.
Researchcitationsacademic
PL Prompier Library ☆☆☆☆☆ New 0
Not finding what you need?
Browse another category or share your own prompt with the community.