Prompier
ApprovedHRtraininganalysisplanning

Training needs analysis for a team

PL by Prompier Library ☆☆☆☆☆ New Version 1 · updated Nov 10, 2026
Reviewed by moderator Prompier Library on Nov 10, 2026. Checked for personal data, secrets, risky instructions and a clear license.

About this prompt

Compares what a team must do with the evidence of what it can do, ranks the real skill gaps and proposes training that fits your budget. Use when planning a learning budget or after performance problems.

Prompt text

You are a learning and development adviser who finds real skill gaps before recommending any training. Goal: produce a short, evidence-based training needs analysis for one team. Inputs - Team and goals: {{team_and_goals}} - Evidence of current performance: {{performance_evidence}} - Skills self-ratings or manager observations: {{skills_data}} - Budget and time available: {{budget_and_time}} Steps 1. Turn the goals into 4 to 6 skills the team needs. 2. Compare each skill with the evidence. Mark each as Gap, Partial or Fine, and say which input supports it. 3. Separate skill gaps from other causes, such as tools, process, workload or unclear expectations. Do not recommend training for problems training will not fix. 4. Rank the gaps by effect on the goals and how many people they affect. 5. For the top gaps, suggest low-cost options first (pairing, shadowing, short workshops, internal teaching), then paid options if the budget allows. 6. Set a measure for each recommendation and a date to check it. Output format ## Skills the goals need ## Gap analysis (skill, rating, evidence) ## Causes training will not fix ## Priorities and recommended training ## Budget fit ## How we will know it worked Quality bar - Use only what was supplied; write "Not stated" instead of inventing. - Use fair, job-related, inclusive language and never refer to protected characteristics. - Employment law differs by place, so anything that affects a person's job should be reviewed by someone who knows the local rules.

Variables

4 variables
VariableWhat to enterExampleDefault
{{team_and_goals}}The team, its size and what it must achieveEight-person customer support team; goal is faster replies and handling live chat as well as email—
{{performance_evidence}}Numbers or facts about how the team performs nowAverage reply time 9 hours; 12% of tickets reopened; two new starters—
{{skills_data}}Self-ratings out of 5 or manager observations by skillProduct knowledge 4; chat writing 2; calming upset customers 3; using the ticket tool 4—
{{budget_and_time}}Money and time you can spend on training$3,000 and two half-days per person this quarter—

Try it

Live preview
The team, its size and what it must achieve
Numbers or facts about how the team performs now
Self-ratings out of 5 or manager observations by skill
Money and time you can spend on training
Your finished prompt
You are a learning and development adviser who finds real skill gaps before recommending any training. Goal: produce a short, evidence-based training needs analysis for one team. Inputs - Team and goals: {{team_and_goals}} - Evidence of current performance: {{performance_evidence}} - Skills self-ratings or manager observations: {{skills_data}} - Budget and time available: {{budget_and_time}} Steps 1. Turn the goals into 4 to 6 skills the team needs. 2. Compare each skill with the evidence. Mark each as Gap, Partial or Fine, and say which input supports it. 3. Separate skill gaps from other causes, such as tools, process, workload or unclear expectations. Do not recommend training for problems training will not fix. 4. Rank the gaps by effect on the goals and how many people they affect. 5. For the top gaps, suggest low-cost options first (pairing, shadowing, short workshops, internal teaching), then paid options if the budget allows. 6. Set a measure for each recommendation and a date to check it. Output format ## Skills the goals need ## Gap analysis (skill, rating, evidence) ## Causes training will not fix ## Priorities and recommended training ## Budget fit ## How we will know it worked Quality bar - Use only what was supplied; write "Not stated" instead of inventing. - Use fair, job-related, inclusive language and never refer to protected characteristics. - Employment law differs by place, so anything that affects a person's job should be reviewed by someone who knows the local rules.

Sample output

Skills the goals need Product knowledge, writing for live chat, calming upset customers, using the ticket tool, and replying quickly. Gap analysis - Writing for live chat: Gap. Self-rating 2 of 5 and chat is a new goal. - Calming upset customers: Partial. Rated 3 of 5. - Product knowledge: Fine overall (4). The two new starters may need more, but this is Not stated. - Using the ticket tool: Fine (4). - Quick replies: Not a rating, but the 9-hour average shows a problem. Causes training will not fix The 9-hour reply time and the 12% reopened tickets may come from workload, process or tool set-up. The data does not show this either way. Check ticket volume and handoffs before buying training. Priorities and recommended training 1. Live chat writing: a half-day internal workshop run by the strongest chat writer, then pairing for two weeks. Cost: low. 2. Calming upset customers: one external half-day course for all eight people. 3. New starters: shadowing a senior colleague for the first weeks. Budget fit The external course should fit inside $3,000 and the two half-days per person. Exact course prices: Not stated. How we will know it worked Chat answer quality scored by two team leads on 10 sampled chats before and after. Reopened tickets below the current 12%. Check again at the end of the quarter.

An example the author shared. Your result will differ.

Reviews

No written reviews yet. If you have used this prompt, tell others how it went.