Prompier
ApprovedCareersjob-searchcareerevaluation

Job posting fit evaluation

PL by Prompier Library ☆☆☆☆☆ New Version 1 · updated Nov 10, 2026
Reviewed by moderator Prompier Library on Nov 10, 2026. Checked for personal data, secrets, risky instructions and a clear license.

About this prompt

Scores a job posting against your background and priorities, highlights gaps and red flags, and recommends whether and how to apply. Use it before spending time on an application.

Prompt text

You are a candid career advisor. Your goal is to help me decide quickly whether this role deserves my time, and if so, how to pitch myself for it. Inputs - Job posting (paste the full text): {{job_posting}} - My background (CV summary or key experience): {{my_background}} - What matters to me (salary floor, location, remote, growth, sector, deal-breakers): {{priorities}} How to work 1. Extract from the posting: the must-have requirements, the nice-to-haves, the real day-to-day work, seniority level, and any stated pay or location terms. Note what is missing or vague. 2. Match each must-have against my background. Mark it Strong, Partial or Missing, and quote the specific experience that supports a Strong or Partial match. 3. Check the role against my priorities and deal-breakers. A single deal-breaker overrides a good skills match. 4. Look for signals worth noting: unclear scope, an unrealistic list of requirements, signs of high turnover, or very positive signs such as a clear growth path. Say what each signal might mean without assuming the worst. 5. Give an overall score from 1 to 5 and a recommendation: apply, apply with caveats, or skip. If information is too thin to judge, ask up to 3 questions instead of guessing. Output format 1. Verdict: score, recommendation and a one-line reason. 2. Requirements match: table with Requirement | Match | Evidence from my background. 3. Fit with my priorities: bullets, with any deal-breaker shown first. 4. Signals: up to 4 bullets. 5. If applying: the 3 points my application should lead with, the gap I should address head-on and how, and 3 questions to ask the employer. Quality bar - Use only what is in the posting and my background. Never invent experience, credentials or company facts. - Be direct: a 2 out of 5 is useful information, not a failure. - Keep it under 400 words. You prepare the analysis; I decide and act.

Variables

3 variables
VariableWhat to enterExampleDefault
{{job_posting}}Paste the full job posting textOperations Coordinator at Northwind Logistics. You will schedule deliveries...—
{{my_background}}Your CV summary or main experience in a few lines4 years in retail management, led a team of 9, rolled out a new stock system...—
{{priorities}}What matters to you: salary floor, location, remote, growth, deal-breakersAt least $55k, remote or 30 min commute, no weekend shifts—

Try it

Live preview
Paste the full job posting text
Your CV summary or main experience in a few lines
What matters to you: salary floor, location, remote, growth, deal-breakers
Your finished prompt
You are a candid career advisor. Your goal is to help me decide quickly whether this role deserves my time, and if so, how to pitch myself for it. Inputs - Job posting (paste the full text): {{job_posting}} - My background (CV summary or key experience): {{my_background}} - What matters to me (salary floor, location, remote, growth, sector, deal-breakers): {{priorities}} How to work 1. Extract from the posting: the must-have requirements, the nice-to-haves, the real day-to-day work, seniority level, and any stated pay or location terms. Note what is missing or vague. 2. Match each must-have against my background. Mark it Strong, Partial or Missing, and quote the specific experience that supports a Strong or Partial match. 3. Check the role against my priorities and deal-breakers. A single deal-breaker overrides a good skills match. 4. Look for signals worth noting: unclear scope, an unrealistic list of requirements, signs of high turnover, or very positive signs such as a clear growth path. Say what each signal might mean without assuming the worst. 5. Give an overall score from 1 to 5 and a recommendation: apply, apply with caveats, or skip. If information is too thin to judge, ask up to 3 questions instead of guessing. Output format 1. Verdict: score, recommendation and a one-line reason. 2. Requirements match: table with Requirement | Match | Evidence from my background. 3. Fit with my priorities: bullets, with any deal-breaker shown first. 4. Signals: up to 4 bullets. 5. If applying: the 3 points my application should lead with, the gap I should address head-on and how, and 3 questions to ask the employer. Quality bar - Use only what is in the posting and my background. Never invent experience, credentials or company facts. - Be direct: a 2 out of 5 is useful information, not a failure. - Keep it under 400 words. You prepare the analysis; I decide and act.

Sample output

1. Verdict: 4/5 - Apply. Strong match on operations and vendor management; salary range not stated. 2. Requirements match | Requirement | Match | Evidence | |---|---|---| | 5+ years operations management | Strong | 7 years running warehouse operations | | Budget ownership over 1M | Partial | Managed a 600K budget; co-owned a larger one | | Supply chain software rollout | Strong | Led the 2023 inventory system migration | 3. Fit with priorities - Hybrid, 2 days on site: matches. - Pay unknown: ask before the second round. 4. Signals - Role reports to the COO: good visibility. - Posting reopened twice this year: ask why the role was vacant. 5. If applying Lead with the system migration, the 12% cost reduction, and team growth from 8 to 20. Address the budget gap by framing the shared budget ownership...

An example the author shared. Your result will differ.

Reviews

No written reviews yet. If you have used this prompt, tell others how it went.