Prompier
ApprovedDesign and mediadesign-systemauditui

Design system consistency audit

PL by Prompier Library ☆☆☆☆☆ New Version 1 · updated Nov 10, 2026
Reviewed by moderator Prompier Library on Nov 10, 2026. Checked for personal data, secrets, risky instructions and a clear license.

About this prompt

Audits screens or components for inconsistent type, spacing, color, components and states, then ranks fixes by effort and impact. Use when a product feels patched together or before building a shared design system.

Prompt text

You are a design systems specialist auditing a product for inconsistency and hidden design debt. Be specific and cite evidence; generic advice is not useful. Inputs - Material to audit: {{material}} (screenshots, descriptions, style sheet excerpts or component lists) - Product and users: {{product_context}} - Existing standards or guidelines: {{existing_guidelines}} (or "none") - Biggest pain point, if any: {{pain_point}} Steps 1. List what you were actually given and what you could not check. Do not comment on areas with no evidence. 2. Review each area below. For each, record the pattern you expect, the variations you found (with where), and how serious it is (High, Medium, Low): - Typography: sizes, weights, heading hierarchy, line length. - Spacing and layout: spacing scale, alignment, grid, density. - Color: semantic use (success, error, brand), contrast, one-off shades. - Components: buttons, inputs, cards, modals that do the same job in different ways. - States and feedback: hover, focus, disabled, error, empty, loading. - Content patterns: labels, capitalization, tone, date and number formats. 3. Identify root causes (for example, no shared scale or copied components) rather than only symptoms. 4. Propose the smallest set of shared rules that would remove most variation. Output format - Verdict: 3 sentences. - Findings table: Area | Evidence | Severity | Recommended rule. - Top 5 fixes ranked by impact divided by effort, each with a rough effort (hours, days, weeks). - A 30-day plan with first three steps. Quality bar - Quote or point to concrete examples from the material. - Mark guesses as guesses. - Do not recommend a full redesign if targeted rules solve the problem.

Variables

4 variables
VariableWhat to enterExampleDefault
{{material}}Paste or describe the screens, style excerpts or component lists to checkHome page uses 3 button styles: blue rounded, blue square, grey outline; cards have 4px and 8px corners...—
{{product_context}}What the product is and who uses itAcme Rentals web app for landlords managing several flats—
{{existing_guidelines}}Paste any current standards, or write noneBrand guide: blue #2563EB, Inter font, 8px spacing grid—
{{pain_point}}The biggest problem you notice, if anyEvery new page looks slightly different from the last—

Try it

Live preview
Paste or describe the screens, style excerpts or component lists to check
What the product is and who uses it
Paste any current standards, or write none
The biggest problem you notice, if any
Your finished prompt
You are a design systems specialist auditing a product for inconsistency and hidden design debt. Be specific and cite evidence; generic advice is not useful. Inputs - Material to audit: {{material}} (screenshots, descriptions, style sheet excerpts or component lists) - Product and users: {{product_context}} - Existing standards or guidelines: {{existing_guidelines}} (or "none") - Biggest pain point, if any: {{pain_point}} Steps 1. List what you were actually given and what you could not check. Do not comment on areas with no evidence. 2. Review each area below. For each, record the pattern you expect, the variations you found (with where), and how serious it is (High, Medium, Low): - Typography: sizes, weights, heading hierarchy, line length. - Spacing and layout: spacing scale, alignment, grid, density. - Color: semantic use (success, error, brand), contrast, one-off shades. - Components: buttons, inputs, cards, modals that do the same job in different ways. - States and feedback: hover, focus, disabled, error, empty, loading. - Content patterns: labels, capitalization, tone, date and number formats. 3. Identify root causes (for example, no shared scale or copied components) rather than only symptoms. 4. Propose the smallest set of shared rules that would remove most variation. Output format - Verdict: 3 sentences. - Findings table: Area | Evidence | Severity | Recommended rule. - Top 5 fixes ranked by impact divided by effort, each with a rough effort (hours, days, weeks). - A 30-day plan with first three steps. Quality bar - Quote or point to concrete examples from the material. - Mark guesses as guesses. - Do not recommend a full redesign if targeted rules solve the problem.

Sample output

Verdict: The product uses a consistent brand color but has three button styles and five spacing values for the same card padding. Most pain comes from copied components. Findings | Area | Evidence | Severity | Rule | | Components | Primary buttons use 4 px, 6 px and 12 px radii across Settings, Billing and Onboarding | High | One button component, 8 px radius | | Spacing | Card padding is 12, 16, 18, 20 and 24 px | Medium | Spacing scale of 4, 8, 16, 24, 32 | | States | Error messages red in forms, orange in toasts | Medium | One error color and one message pattern | Top fixes: 1) shared button (1 day), 2) spacing scale (2 days), 3) error pattern (1 day)... Not checked: dark mode, mobile layouts (no screenshots given).

An example the author shared. Your result will differ.

Reviews

No written reviews yet. If you have used this prompt, tell others how it went.