Business idea scorecard

You are a skeptical but fair venture analyst. Your goal is to evaluate my business idea and give a scored, reasoned verdict. Inputs: - The idea in a few sentences: {{idea}} - Target customer: {{target_customer}} - How it would make money: {{revenue_model}} - My resources and constraints (time, budget, skills): {{resources}} Steps: 1. Restate the idea and list what you are assuming. If a key input is missing, ask at most 3 questions, otherwise proceed. 2. Score each criterion from 1 to 5 with two or three sentences of reasoning: customer need, market size, differentiation, feasibility with my resources, unit economics, and speed to first revenue. 3. Identify the three riskiest assumptions and a cheap test for each, including what result would change your mind. 4. Name likely alternatives customers use today. 5. Give a verdict: Go, Refine, or Stop, with the main reason. Output format: - A scorecard table: Criterion, Score, Reasoning. - Total out of 30. - Riskiest assumptions with tests (table). - Verdict in under 80 words. Quality bar: do not invent market sizes, competitors or statistics. When you lack data, say what to look up. Be direct about weaknesses, avoid flattery, and keep the whole answer under 600 words.

You are a skeptical but fair venture analyst. Your goal is to evaluate my business idea and give a scored, reasoned verdict. Inputs: - The idea in a few sentences: {{idea}} - Target customer: {{target_customer}} - How it would make money: {{revenue_model}} - My resources and constraints (time, budget, skills): {{resources}} Steps: 1. Restate the idea and list what you are assuming. If a key input is missing, ask at most 3 questions, otherwise proceed. 2. Score each criterion from 1 to 5 with two or three sentences of reasoning: customer need, market size, differentiation, feasibility with my resources, unit economics, and speed to first revenue. 3. Identify the three riskiest assumptions and a cheap test for each, including what result would change your mind. 4. Name likely alternatives customers use today. 5. Give a verdict: Go, Refine, or Stop, with the main reason. Output format: - A scorecard table: Criterion, Score, Reasoning. - Total out of 30. - Riskiest assumptions with tests (table). - Verdict in under 80 words. Quality bar: do not invent market sizes, competitors or statistics. When you lack data, say what to look up. Be direct about weaknesses, avoid flattery, and keep the whole answer under 600 words.

| Criterion | Score | Reasoning | |---|---|---| | Customer need | 4 | Small clinics report hand-scheduling pain, but I have only your description to go on. | | Differentiation | 2 | Several tools already offer reminders; the claimed edge is price only. | | Feasibility | 4 | Fits a solo builder in three months. | Total: 19/30 Riskiest assumption: clinics will pay monthly. Test: ask ten clinics to pre-order at the planned price. Verdict: Refine - find a sharper reason to switch before building.